| AMD E2-2000 | Intel Core m5-6Y57 | |
| 18 W | Max TDP | 4.5 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD E2-2000 vs Intel Core m5-6Y57
The AMD E2-2000 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 18 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 413 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Kabini (Jaguar) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q1/2013
The Intel Core m5-6Y57 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.80 GHz base 2.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 4.5 W.The processor is attached to the BGA 1515 CPU socket. This version includes 4.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support LPDDR3-1866 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 10 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Skylake Y Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2015
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Compare Detail
| 1.75 GHz | Frequency | 1.10 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | 2.80 GHz |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.20 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| AMD Radeon HD 7340 | GPU | Intel HD Graphics 515 |
| 0.70 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| 0.70 GHz | GPU (Turbo) | 0.90 GHz |
| 11 | DirectX Version | 12 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 3 |
| DDR3-1333 | Memory | LPDDR3-1866 |
| 1 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 3.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 10 | |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| BGA 413 | Socket | BGA 1515 |
| 18 W | TDP | 4.5 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d |
| Q1/2013 | Release date | Q3/2015 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E2-2000
(0%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
161 (18%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E2-2000
(0%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
419 (2%)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E2-2000
(0%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
122 (35%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E2-2000
(0%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
228 (2%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E2-2000
144 (6%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
593 (26%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E2-2000
274 (1%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
1,125 (2%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD E2-2000
113 (1%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
347 (2%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E2-2000
671 (10%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
2,912 (42%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E2-2000
1,211 (1%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
4,865 (5%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E2-2000
(0%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
1.38 (37%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E2-2000
0.68 (1%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
2.53 (5%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.
AMD E2-2000
8.83 (14%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
16.74 (27%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD E2-2000
829 (1%)
Intel Core m5-6Y57
3,306 (3%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Core i3-4130T vs
AMD E2-2000
AMD E1-2500 vs
AMD E2-2000
AMD E2-2000 vs
AMD E2-3800
AMD E2-2000 vs
Intel Celeron J1900
AMD E2-2000 vs
Intel Celeron N2806
AMD E2-2000 vs
Intel Pentium G2010
AMD E2-2000 vs
AMD Phenom II X4 910
Intel Celeron N2930 vs
AMD E2-2000
AMD E2-2000 vs
Intel Pentium G3220
Intel Celeron 1007U vs
AMD E2-2000
AMD E2-2000 vs
Intel Pentium N3520
AMD E2-2000 vs
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core i3-3227U vs
AMD E2-2000
Intel Core i7-4790K vs
AMD E2-2000
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
AMD E2-2000
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core M-5Y71
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core m7-6Y75
Intel Core i5-6300U vs
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core m3-6Y30 vs
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core m5-6Y54 vs
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core i5-4300U
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core i5-6200U
Intel Atom x5-Z8300 vs
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core m3-7Y30
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core i7-4650U
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core i5-6440EQ
Intel Core i5-3210M vs
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core i5-8250U
Intel Core m5-6Y57 vs
Intel Core i5-7Y54
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 vs
Intel Core m5-6Y57
Comments
