| AMD E1-6010 | AMD E2-3000 | |
| 10 W | Max TDP | 15 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD E1-6010 vs AMD E2-3000
The AMD E1-6010 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 10 W.The processor is attached to the AM1 CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Beema (Puma) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2014
The AMD E2-3000 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes 1.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Llano (K10) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2013
Compare Detail
| 1.35 GHz | Frequency | 1.65 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| -- | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| -- | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | Yes  |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| AMD Radeon R2 (Beema) | GPU | AMD Radeon HD 8280 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 11.1 |
| 2 | Max. displays | 2 |
| DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM | Memory | DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM |
| 1 | Memory channels | 1 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 1.00 MB | L3 Cache | 1.00 MB |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 28 nm | Technology | 28 nm |
| AM1 | Socket | N/A |
| 10 W | TDP | 15 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q2/2014 | Release date | Q3/2013 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E1-6010
28 (8%)
AMD E2-3000
(0%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E1-6010
46 (0%)
AMD E2-3000
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E1-6010
144 (6%)
AMD E2-3000
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E1-6010
262 (1%)
AMD E2-3000
(0%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD E1-6010
91 (0%)
AMD E2-3000
116 (1%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E1-6010
701 (10%)
AMD E2-3000
951 (14%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E1-6010
1,135 (1%)
AMD E2-3000
920 (1%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD E1-6010
0.32 (9%)
AMD E2-3000
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD E1-6010
0.62 (1%)
AMD E2-3000
(0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD E1-6010
886 (1%)
AMD E2-3000
1,178 (1%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Core i3-4030U vs
AMD E1-6010
Intel Celeron N2840 vs
AMD E1-6010
Intel Core i5-4210U vs
AMD E1-6010
Intel Celeron N2830 vs
AMD E1-6010
AMD E1-2100 vs
AMD E1-6010
AMD E1-6010 vs
AMD A6-6310
AMD A6-5200 vs
AMD E1-6010
AMD E1-6010 vs
AMD E1-2500
AMD E1-6010 vs
AMD A4-5000
AMD E1-6010 vs
AMD E2-6110
AMD E1-6010 vs
Intel Celeron N3350
AMD E1-6010 vs
AMD A4-6210
AMD E1-6010 vs
AMD E-300
Intel Celeron N3050 vs
AMD E1-6010
AMD A8-6410 vs
AMD E1-6010
Intel Atom D2500 vs
AMD E2-3000
AMD E2-3800 vs
AMD E2-3000
Intel Pentium G2020 vs
AMD E2-3000
Intel Core i3-3227U vs
AMD E2-3000
Intel Atom E3845 vs
AMD E2-3000
Intel Pentium G2030 vs
AMD E2-3000
AMD E2-3000 vs
AMD A4-5000
AMD A8-5500B vs
AMD E2-3000
AMD Phenom II X2 B59 vs
AMD E2-3000
AMD E2-3000 vs
AMD Phenom II X3 B77
Intel Celeron N2830 vs
AMD E2-3000
AMD E2-3000 vs
Intel Celeron N2940
AMD E2-3000 vs
Intel Core i5-5675R
AMD E1-6010 vs
AMD E2-3000
AMD E2-3000 vs
AMD Phenom II X4 820
Comments
