| AMD A6-9220 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 | |
| 15 W | Max TDP | |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD A6-9220 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
The AMD A6-9220 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.90 GHz base 2.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the FP4 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 1 memory channels to support DDR4-2133 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 8 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 90 °C degrees C. In particular, Stoney Ridge (Excavator) Architecture is enhanced with 28 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2017
The Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 operates with 8 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 1.80 GHz base 1.60 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at .The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support LPDDR4-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Kryo 260 Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q4/2017
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Compare Detail
| 2.50 GHz | Frequency | 1.80 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2.90 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 1.80 GHz |
| 2.70 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 1.60 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
| No |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
| AMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) | GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 509 |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | 0.72 GHz |
| 12 | DirectX Version | 12.1 |
| 3 | Max. displays | 0 |
| DDR4-2133 | Memory | LPDDR4-1333 |
| 1 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| 3.0 | PCIe version | |
| 8 | PCIe lanes | |
| 28 nm | Technology | 14 nm |
| FP4 | Socket | N/A |
| 15 W | TDP | |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | None |
| Q2/2017 | Release date | Q4/2017 |
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A6-9220
73 (21%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A6-9220
113 (1%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A6-9220
(0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
271 (12%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A6-9220
(0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
1,138 (2%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD A6-9220
252 (1%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
185 (1%)
AnTuTu 8 benchmark
The AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX (User Experience) by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems.
AMD A6-9220
(0%)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
149,540 (21%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD A6-9220
2,159 (2%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U vs
AMD A6-9220
Intel Celeron N4020 vs
AMD A6-9220
AMD A6-9220 vs
Intel Core i3-1005G1
AMD A6-9220 vs
Intel Celeron N4000
AMD A6-9220 vs
Intel Core i5-4258U
AMD A6-9220 vs
Intel Core i5-7200U
AMD A6-9220 vs
Intel Core i3-7020U
Intel Pentium Silver N5000 vs
AMD A6-9220
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U vs
AMD A6-9220
AMD A6-9220 vs
Intel Celeron N3350
AMD A9-9420 vs
AMD A6-9220
Intel Celeron N4500 vs
AMD A6-9220
Intel Pentium Silver N5030 vs
AMD A6-9220
AMD FX-6300 vs
AMD A6-9220
AMD A6-9220 vs
Intel Pentium Gold 6405U
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
MediaTek Helio G96
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 non LTE
Comments
