GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

AMD A4-6210 vs Intel Xeon Platinum 9242

AMD A4-6210

The AMD A4-6210 operates with 4 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 15 W.The processor is attached to the AM1 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Richland (Piledriver) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2014

AMD A4-6210

The Intel Xeon Platinum 9242 operates with 48 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 3.80 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 350 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 71.50 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 12 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 48 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cascade Lake Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2019


Compare Detail

1.80 GHz Frequency 2.30 GHz
4 Cores 48
-- Turbo (1 Core) 3.80 GHz
-- Turbo (All Cores) 2.50 GHz
uncheck No Hyperthreading Yes check
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
AMD Radeon R3 (Beema) GPU no iGPU
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
32 nm Technology 14 nm
No turbo GPU (Turbo) No turbo
12 DirectX Version
2 Max. displays
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM Memory DDR4-2933
2 Memory channels 12
Max memory
uncheck No ECC Yes check
-- L2 Cache --
2.00 MB L3 Cache 71.50 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 48
32 nm Technology 14 nm
AM1 Socket LGA 3647
15 W TDP 350 W
AMD-V Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q2/2014 Release date Q3/2019

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD A4-6210 199 (9%)
9% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD A4-6210 630 (1%)
1% Complete
0% Complete

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

AMD A4-6210 155 (1%)
1% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

AMD A4-6210 992 (14%)
14% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

AMD A4-6210 3,027 (3%)
3% Complete
0% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

AMD A4-6210 2,165 (2%)
2% Complete
0% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

AMD A4-6210 Intel Xeon Platinum 9242
15 W Max TDP 350 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Comments

back to top