| AMD A4-3300M | Intel Core2 Duo E6700 | |
| 35 W | Max TDP | 65 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD A4-3300M vs Intel Core2 Duo E6700
The AMD A4-3300M operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at 2.50 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the FS1 CPU socket. This version includes 2.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Llano (K10) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q2/2011
The Intel Core2 Duo E6700 operates with 2 cores and 2 CPU threads. It run at -- base -- all cores while the TDP is set at 65 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 775 CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Conroe (Core) Architecture is enhanced with 65 nm technology and supports VT-x. The product was launched on Q3/2006
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Compare Detail
| 1.90 GHz | Frequency | 2.66 GHz |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | -- |
| 2.50 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | -- |
 No |
Hyperthreading | No |
 Yes |
Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| AMD Radeon HD 6480G | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 32 nm | Technology | 65 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 11 | DirectX Version | |
| 2 | Max. displays | |
| DDR3-1333 | Memory | DDR2-1066DDR3-1333 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| No |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | 4.00 MB |
| 2.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
| PCIe version | ||
| PCIe lanes | ||
| 32 nm | Technology | 65 nm |
| FS1 | Socket | LGA 775 |
| 35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | VT-x |
| Q2/2011 | Release date | Q3/2006 |
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3300M
260 (11%)
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
368 (16%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3300M
468 (1%)
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
618 (1%)
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
AMD A4-3300M
214 (1%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3300M
1,017 (15%)
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
1,528 (22%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3300M
1,929 (2%)
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
2,794 (3%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD A4-3300M
(0%)
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
1.01 (27%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD A4-3300M
1.13 (2%)
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
1.83 (3%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD A4-3300M
1,243 (1%)
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
1,015 (1%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD A4-5100 vs
AMD A4-3300M
Intel Core i5-4200U vs
AMD A4-3300M
Intel Core i3-3220T vs
AMD A4-3300M
AMD A4-3300M vs
Intel Core i5-4250U
AMD A8-6600K vs
AMD A4-3300M
AMD A4-3300M vs
Intel Core i5-4210U
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
AMD A4-3300M
Intel Pentium J2900 vs
AMD A4-3300M
AMD A4-3300M vs
Intel Pentium N3530
Intel Pentium N3510 vs
AMD A4-3300M
AMD A4-3300M vs
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
Intel Core i3-4010U vs
AMD A4-3300M
Intel Core i5-6500 vs
AMD A4-3300M
AMD A4-3300M vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v6 vs
AMD A4-3300M
Raspberry Pi 4 B (Broadcom BCM2711) vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Intel Core i3-4150
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Pentium N3700 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Core i3-5005U vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Core M-5Y10 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
AMD A4-5000
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Intel Atom x5-Z8300
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Intel Core i5-5250U
Intel Core i3-5010U vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Intel Core i5-4200U
Intel Core2 Duo E6700 vs
Intel Celeron N2940
Intel Core i5-7200U vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Intel Celeron N3450 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
AMD E-240 vs
Intel Core2 Duo E6700
Comments
