GET FREE $100 Welcome Offer
BUY AND SELL BTC, BNB, CAKE, DOGE, ETH AND 27 MORE
BUY AND SELL BTC,
BNB, CAKE, DOGE
ETH AND 27 MORE

Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Xeon W-3275

Intel Core i3-3220T

The Intel Core i3-3220T operates with 2 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 1155 CPU socket. This version includes 3.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1600 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Ivy Bridge S Architecture is enhanced with 22 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q3/2012

Intel Core i3-3220T

The Intel Xeon W-3275 operates with 28 cores and 4 CPU threads. It run at 4.60 GHz base 3.40 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 205 W.The processor is attached to the LGA 3647 CPU socket. This version includes 38.50 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 6 memory channels to support DDR4-2933 RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen 64 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Cascade Lake W Architecture is enhanced with 14 nm technology and supports VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d. The product was launched on Q2/2019


Compare Detail

2.80 GHz Frequency 2.50 GHz
2 Cores 28
No turbo Turbo (1 Core) 4.60 GHz
No turbo Turbo (All Cores) 3.40 GHz
check Yes Hyperthreading Yes check
uncheck No Overclocking No uncheck
normal Core Architecture normal
Intel HD Graphics 2500 GPU no iGPU
1.05 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
22 nm Technology 14 nm
1.05 GHz GPU (Turbo) No turbo
11.0 DirectX Version
3 Max. displays
DDR3-1600 Memory DDR4-2933
2 Memory channels 6
Max memory
uncheck No ECC Yes check
-- L2 Cache --
3.00 MB L3 Cache 38.50 MB
PCIe version 3.0
PCIe lanes 64
22 nm Technology 14 nm
LGA 1155 Socket LGA 3647
35 W TDP 205 W
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d Virtualization VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Q3/2012 Release date Q2/2019

Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
Intel Xeon W-3275 1,114 (50%)
50% Complete

Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
Intel Xeon W-3275 28,057 (43%)
43% Complete

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

0% Complete
Intel Xeon W-3275 444 (50%)
50% Complete

Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

0% Complete
Intel Xeon W-3275 11,026 (44%)
44% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

32% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)

Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

2% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

25% Complete
Intel Xeon W-3275 1,102 (49%)
49% Complete

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Core i3-3220T 1,142 (3%)
3% Complete
Intel Xeon W-3275 17,201 (35%)
35% Complete

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.

1% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Core i3-3220T 2,272 (33%)
33% Complete
0% Complete

Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

Intel Core i3-3220T 4,783 (5%)
5% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.

Intel Core i3-3220T 1.25 (46%)
46% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.

5% Complete
0% Complete

Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)

Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The iGPU test uses the CPU internal graphic unit to execute OpenGL commands.

Intel Core i3-3220T 10.83 (17%)
17% Complete
0% Complete

Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark

Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.

Intel Core i3-3220T 3,733 (4%)
4% Complete
Intel Xeon W-3275 36,627 (34%)
34% Complete
Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Electric Usage Estimate

Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Xeon W-3275
35 W Max TDP 205 W
NA Power consumption per day (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per day NA
NA Power consumption per year (kWh) NA
NA Running cost per year NA

Popular Comparision

Intel Pentium G2020 Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Pentium G2020 vs Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A6-6400K
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A6-6400K
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Core i3-4130T
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Core i3-4130T
Intel Atom D2550 Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Atom D2550 vs Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Celeron G1820
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Celeron G1820
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD E1-2100
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD E1-2100
Intel Core i3-6100 Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i3-6100 vs Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD Athlon II X4 740
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD Athlon II X4 740
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Celeron J1900
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A8-6500
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A8-6500
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD E1-2500
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD E1-2500
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A4-6300
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A4-6300
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A4-3300M
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A4-3300M
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Celeron G1620T
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Celeron G1620T
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Atom C2350
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Atom C2350
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Celeron G1630
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Celeron G1630
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A8-3550MX
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A8-3550MX
Intel Core M-5Y10 Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core M-5Y10 vs Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Pentium G3220T
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Pentium G3220T
Intel Core i5-4570S Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i5-4570S vs Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i3-3220T Intel Celeron 3955U
Intel Core i3-3220T vs Intel Celeron 3955U
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A6-5350M
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A6-5350M
AMD Phenom II X3 700e Intel Core i3-3220T
AMD Phenom II X3 700e vs Intel Core i3-3220T
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A8-6600K
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A8-6600K
Intel Core i3-3220T AMD A8-7600
Intel Core i3-3220T vs AMD A8-7600
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275M vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3175X Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3175X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Core i9-12900K Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Core i9-12900K vs Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Intel Xeon W-3275 AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Epyc 7742 Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Epyc 7742 vs Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Epyc 7F72 Intel Xeon W-3275
AMD Epyc 7F72 vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Xeon W-3225
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs Intel Xeon W-3225
Intel Xeon Gold 6250L Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon Gold 6250L vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Pentium Gold G5400 vs Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Xeon W-3275 Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Xeon W-3275 vs Intel Core i5-6400
Intel Core i5-8210Y Intel Xeon W-3275
Intel Core i5-8210Y vs Intel Xeon W-3275

Comments

back to top