AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX | Apple M1X | |
280 W | Max TDP | 35 W |
NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per day | NA |
NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX vs Apple M1X
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX operates with 64 cores and 128 CPU threads. It run at 4.20 GHz base 3.00 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 280 W.The processor is attached to the WRX8 (sWRX8) CPU socket. This version includes 256.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 72 lanes. Tjunction keeps below 95 °C degrees C. In particular, Castle Peak (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q1/2021
The Apple M1X operates with 12 cores and 128 CPU threads. It run at No turbo base No turbo all cores while the TDP is set at 35 W.The processor is attached to the N/A CPU socket. This version includes -- of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support LPDDR4X-4266 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, M1X Architecture is enhanced with 5 nm technology and supports None. The product was launched on Q3/2021
AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 3995WX
Compare Detail
2.70 GHz | Frequency | 3.35 GHz |
64 | Cores | 12 |
4.20 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | No turbo |
3.00 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | No turbo |
Yes | Hyperthreading | No |
Yes | Overclocking | No |
normal | Core Architecture | hybrid (big.LITTLE) |
no iGPU | GPU | Apple M1X (16 Core) |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
7 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
DirectX Version | ||
Max. displays | 3 | |
DDR4-3200 | Memory | LPDDR4X-4266 |
8 | Memory channels | 2 |
Max memory | ||
Yes | ECC | No |
-- | L2 Cache | 32.00 MB |
256.00 MB | L3 Cache | -- |
4.0 | PCIe version | 4.0 |
72 | PCIe lanes | |
7 nm | Technology | 5 nm |
WRX8 (sWRX8) | Socket | N/A |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | None |
Q1/2021 | Release date | Q3/2021 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy (32 bit) in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per second.
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.