| AMD FX-9370 | AMD Epyc 7702 | |
| 220 W | Max TDP | 200 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD FX-9370 vs AMD Epyc 7702
The AMD FX-9370 operates with 8 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 4.70 GHz base 4.70 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 220 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support DDR3-1866 RAM and features PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Piledriver) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q3/2013
The AMD Epyc 7702 operates with 64 cores and 8 CPU threads. It run at 3.35 GHz base 2.50 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 200 W.The processor is attached to the SP3 CPU socket. This version includes 256.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 128 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Rome (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q3/2019
Compare Detail
| 4.40 GHz | Frequency | 2.00 GHz |
| 8 | Cores | 64 |
| 4.70 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 3.35 GHz |
| 4.70 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 2.50 GHz |
 No |
Hyperthreading | Yes  |
| Yes |
Overclocking | No |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 32 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| DDR3-1866 | Memory | DDR4-3200 |
| 2 | Memory channels | 8 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | Yes |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 8.00 MB | L3 Cache | 256.00 MB |
| PCIe version | 4.0 | |
| PCIe lanes | 128 | |
| 32 nm | Technology | 7 nm |
| AM3+ | Socket | SP3 |
| 220 W | TDP | 200 W |
| AMD-V | Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM |
| Q3/2013 | Release date | Q3/2019 |
Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-9370
(0%)
AMD Epyc 7702
1,002 (45%)
Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R23 is the successor of Cinebench R20 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-9370
(0%)
AMD Epyc 7702
49,044 (75%)
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-9370
(0%)
AMD Epyc 7702
397 (45%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-9370
(0%)
AMD Epyc 7702
18,866 (75%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-9370
700 (7%)
AMD Epyc 7702
(0%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-9370
617 (27%)
AMD Epyc 7702
787 (35%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-9370
3,041 (6%)
AMD Epyc 7702
11,455 (23%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
AMD FX-9370
787.95 (39%)
AMD Epyc 7702
403.94 (20%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-9370
2,391 (34%)
AMD Epyc 7702
(0%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-9370
12,409 (13%)
AMD Epyc 7702
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD FX-9370
1.40 (38%)
AMD Epyc 7702
(0%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD FX-9370
8.40 (15%)
AMD Epyc 7702
(0%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD FX-9370
9,653 (9%)
AMD Epyc 7702
62,417 (58%)
Monero Hashrate kH/s
The crypto currency Monero has been using the RandomX algorithm since November 2019. This PoW (proof of work) algorithm can only efficiently be calculated using a processor (CPU) or a graphics card (GPU). The CryptoNight algorithm was used for Monero until November 2019, but it could be calculated using ASICs. RandomX benefits from a high number of CPU cores, cache and a fast connection of the memory via as many memory channels as possible
AMD FX-9370
(0%)
AMD Epyc 7702
94 (88%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
Intel Core i7-4790K vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD FX-9370 vs
AMD FX-8350
AMD FX-8370 vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD FX-9370 vs
AMD FX-9590
AMD FX-8120 vs
AMD FX-9370
Intel Core i5-4690 vs
AMD FX-9370
Intel Core i5-3570K vs
AMD FX-9370
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD FX-4170 vs
AMD FX-9370
Intel Core i5-4690K vs
AMD FX-9370
Intel Core i7-4770K vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD FX-6350 vs
AMD FX-9370
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD Phenom II X6 1075T vs
AMD FX-9370
Intel Core i5-4570 vs
AMD FX-9370
AMD Epyc 7742 vs
AMD Epyc 7702
Intel Xeon Gold 6140 vs
AMD Epyc 7702
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
AMD Epyc 7702P
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
AMD Epyc 7502
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6138F
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
Intel Xeon Platinum 8176
AMD Epyc 7662 vs
AMD Epyc 7702
Intel Core i9-9900 vs
AMD Epyc 7702
Intel Xeon Platinum 8380HL vs
AMD Epyc 7702
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
AMD Epyc 7302
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6148
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
Intel Core i5-6200U
AMD Epyc 7702 vs
Intel Xeon Gold 5120T
Comments
