| AMD Epyc 7402P | AMD FX-6300 | |
| 180 W | Max TDP | 95 W |
| NA | Power consumption per day (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per day | NA |
| NA | Power consumption per year (kWh) | NA |
| NA | Running cost per year | NA |
AMD Epyc 7402P vs AMD FX-6300
The AMD Epyc 7402P operates with 24 cores and 48 CPU threads. It run at 3.35 GHz base 3.20 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 180 W.The processor is attached to the SP3 CPU socket. This version includes 128.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 8 memory channels to support DDR4-3200 RAM and features 4.0 PCIe Gen 128 lanes. Tjunction keeps below -- degrees C. In particular, Rome (Zen 2) Architecture is enhanced with 7 nm technology and supports AMD-V, SVM. The product was launched on Q3/2019
The AMD FX-6300 operates with 6 cores and 48 CPU threads. It run at 4.10 GHz base 4.10 GHz all cores while the TDP is set at 95 W.The processor is attached to the AM3+ CPU socket. This version includes 8.00 MB of L3 cache on one chip, supports 2 memory channels to support RAM and features 3.0 PCIe Gen lanes. Tjunction keeps below 71 °C degrees C. In particular, Vishera (Bulldozer) Architecture is enhanced with 32 nm technology and supports AMD-V. The product was launched on Q4/2012
Compare Detail
| 2.80 GHz | Frequency | 3.50 GHz |
| 24 | Cores | 6 |
| 3.35 GHz | Turbo (1 Core) | 4.10 GHz |
| 3.20 GHz | Turbo (All Cores) | 4.10 GHz |
 Yes |
Hyperthreading | No |
 No |
Overclocking | Yes |
| normal | Core Architecture | normal |
| no iGPU | GPU | no iGPU |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| 7 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| No turbo | GPU (Turbo) | No turbo |
| DirectX Version | ||
| Max. displays | ||
| DDR4-3200 | Memory | |
| 8 | Memory channels | 2 |
| Max memory | ||
| Yes |
ECC | No |
| -- | L2 Cache | -- |
| 128.00 MB | L3 Cache | 8.00 MB |
| 4.0 | PCIe version | 3.0 |
| 128 | PCIe lanes | |
| 7 nm | Technology | 32 nm |
| SP3 | Socket | AM3+ |
| 180 W | TDP | 95 W |
| AMD-V, SVM | Virtualization | AMD-V |
| Q3/2019 | Release date | Q4/2012 |
Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Epyc 7402P
397 (45%)
AMD FX-6300
199 (22%)
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 is the successor of Cinebench R15 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
855 (3%)
Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
98 (28%)
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 is the successor of Cinebench 11.5 and is also based on the Cinema 4 Suite. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
457 (4%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
533 (24%)
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
1,917 (4%)
Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
Blender is a free 3D graphics software for rendering (creating) 3D bodies, which can also be textured and animated in the software. The Blender benchmark creates predefined scenes and measures the time (s) required for the entire scene. The shorter the time required, the better. We selected bmw27 as the benchmark scene.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
1,415 (69%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
2,078 (30%)
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
8,143 (9%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't count.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
1.12 (30%)
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Cinebench 11.5 is based on the Cinema 4D Suite, a software that is popular to generate forms and other stuff in 3D. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of hyperthreading.
AMD Epyc 7402P
(0%)
AMD FX-6300
4.93 (9%)
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
Some of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-Comparison. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-Comparison’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd.
AMD Epyc 7402P
28,246 (26%)
AMD FX-6300
4,183 (4%)
Electric Usage Estimate
Electric Usage Estimate
Popular Comparision
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
AMD Epyc 7402
AMD Epyc 7302P vs
AMD Epyc 7402P
AMD Epyc 7F72 vs
AMD Epyc 7402P
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6240
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
AMD Epyc 7443P
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6230
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
AMD Epyc 7502P
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
AMD Epyc 7402P vs
Intel Xeon Gold 6136
Intel Core i5-1030G7 vs
AMD Epyc 7402P
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U vs
AMD Epyc 7402P
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 vs
AMD Epyc 7402P
AMD FX-6300 vs
AMD FX-8300
Intel Core i5-4460 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-6300 vs
AMD Phenom II X6 1090T
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T vs
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i3-4150 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD A8-7600 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-6300 vs
AMD FX-8320E
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs
AMD FX-6300
Intel Core i5-4590 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD Athlon 3000G vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-6300 vs
AMD A10-7800
AMD Phenom II X4 945 vs
AMD FX-6300
AMD FX-6300 vs
AMD FX-8120
Comments
